User:IssaRice/Adverb negative adjective - Revision history

IssaRice at 05:10, 7 February 2019

2019-02-07T05:10:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 7 February 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense
	* "negation incomplete" to mean "''not'' negation-complete" (see Peter Smith's Godel book)		* "negation incomplete" to mean "''not'' negation-complete" (see Peter Smith's Godel book)
			* <math>\omega</math>-incomplete (not <math>\omega</math>-complete) and <math>\omega</math>-inconsistent (not <math>\omega</math>-consistent), although these are a bit odd because the negation versions are defined first.

	This one is slightly different:		This one is slightly different:

	* "non-recursive enumerability" to mean "not (recursively enumerable)" -- see Cutland p. 130.		* "non-recursive enumerability" to mean "not (recursively enumerable)" -- see Cutland p. 130.

IssaRice at 23:59, 1 January 2019

2019-01-01T23:59:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 1 January 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense
	* "negation incomplete" to mean "''not'' negation-complete" (see Peter Smith's Godel book)		* "negation incomplete" to mean "''not'' negation-complete" (see Peter Smith's Godel book)

			This one is slightly different:

			* "non-recursive enumerability" to mean "not (recursively enumerable)" -- see Cutland p. 130.

IssaRice at 02:30, 19 December 2018

2018-12-19T02:30:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 19 December 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao. -- this sounds like the series does the diverging thing in an absolute manner, which makes no sense.		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao. -- this sounds like the series does the diverging thing in an absolute manner, which makes no sense.
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense
			* "negation incomplete" to mean "''not'' negation-complete" (see Peter Smith's Godel book)

IssaRice at 06:31, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T06:31:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:31, 9 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Sometimes the pattern '''adverb followed by (negative adjective)''' is used in mathematical terms to mean '''negative followed by (adverb adjective)''', and I find this confusing. Here are two examples:		Sometimes the pattern '''adverb followed by (negative adjective)''' is used in mathematical terms to mean '''negative followed by (adverb adjective)''', and I find this confusing. Here are two examples:

	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao. -- this sounds like the series does the diverging thing in an absolute manner, which makes no sense.
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set") -- this sounds like there is some recursive/computable process that "inseparates" the two sets, which makes no sense

IssaRice at 06:29, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T06:29:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 9 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Sometimes the pattern '''adverb (negative adjective)''' is used in mathematical terms to mean '''negative (adverb adjective)''', and I find this confusing. Here are two examples:		Sometimes the pattern '''adverb followed by (negative adjective)''' is used in mathematical terms to mean '''negative followed by (adverb adjective)''', and I find this confusing. Here are two examples:

	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")

IssaRice at 06:28, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T06:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 9 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Sometimes the pattern '''adverb (negative adjective)''' is used in mathematical terms to mean '''negative (adverb adjective)''', and I find this confusing. Here are two examples:

	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")

IssaRice at 06:26, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T06:26:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 9 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable"		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable" (equivalently, "''not'' separable by a recursive set")

IssaRice at 06:26, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T06:26:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 9 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent"		* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" see [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/basic-logic-connectives-not/#comment-12071 this comment] by Terence Tao
	* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable"		* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets\|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable"

IssaRice: Created page with "* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" * "recursively inseparable" to mean "''not'' recursively separable""

2018-12-09T06:25:01Z

Created page with "* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent" * "recursively inseparable" to mean "''not'' recursively separable""

New page

* "absolutely divergent" to mean "''not'' absolutely convergent"
* "[[wikipedia:Recursively inseparable sets|recursively inseparable]]" to mean "''not'' recursively separable"