User:IssaRice/Computability and logic/Expresses versus captures: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
! Text !! "Expresses" !! "Captures" | ! Text !! "Expresses" !! "Captures" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Peter Smith. Godel book || expresses || captures | | Peter Smith. Godel book (see especially footnote 9 on p. 45) || expresses || captures | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Leary & Kristiansen || defines || represents | | Leary & Kristiansen || defines || represents | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 7 February 2019
The expresses versus captures distinction is an important one in mathematical logic, but unfortunately the terminology differs wildly between different texts. The following table gives a comparison.
- Expressing is done by a language. There is only one form of expressing; I think this follows from the wikipedia:Law of excluded middle.
- Capturing is done by a theory or by axioms. There are two forms of capturing: strong capture (corresponding to deciding), and weak capture (corresponding to recognizing, or semi-deciding).
| Text | "Expresses" | "Captures" |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Smith. Godel book (see especially footnote 9 on p. 45) | expresses | captures |
| Leary & Kristiansen | defines | represents |
| Goldrei | defines (but the book also uses "represents")[1] | |
| Boolos, Burgess, Jeffrey | arithmetically defines[2] | defines (for sets), represents (for functions)[2] |
| Wikipedia | arithmetically defines |