User:IssaRice/AI safety/Comparison of terms related to agency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* can it be modeled as having a utility function? | * can it be modeled as having a utility function? | ||
* can we take an intentional stance toward it? i.e., is it useful (so far as predicting what it will do is concerned) to model it as having intentions? | * can we take an intentional stance toward it? i.e., is it useful (so far as predicting what it will do is concerned) to model it as having intentions? | ||
* is it solving some sort of optimization problem? (but what counts as an optimization problem?) | |||
examples to check against: | examples to check against: | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 2 September 2019
| Term | Opposite |
|---|---|
| Agent | |
| Optimizer, optimization process | |
| consequentialist | |
| expected utility maximizer | |
| goal-directed, goal-based | act-based? |
| pseudoconsequentialist |
parameters to check for:
- is it searching through a list of potential answers?
- does it have an explicit model of the world? i.e. it has counterfactuals (see drescher on subactivation)
- can it be modeled as having a utility function?
- can we take an intentional stance toward it? i.e., is it useful (so far as predicting what it will do is concerned) to model it as having intentions?
- is it solving some sort of optimization problem? (but what counts as an optimization problem?)
examples to check against:
- humans
- evolution/natural selection
- bottlecap
- RL system playing Pong without an explicit model