User:IssaRice/Taking inf and sup separately: Difference between revisions
m (IssaRice moved page User:IssaRice/taking inf and sup separately to User:IssaRice/Taking inf and sup separately) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Let <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> be bounded subsets of the real line. Suppose that for every <math>a\in A</math> and <math>b\in B</math> we have <math>a\geq b</math>. Then <math>\inf(A)\geq \sup(B)</math>. | Let <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> be bounded subsets of the real line. Suppose that for every <math>a\in A</math> and <math>b\in B</math> we have <math>a\geq b</math>. Then <math>\inf(A)\geq \sup(B)</math>. | ||
Actually, do <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> have to be bounded? I think they can even be empty! | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
Revision as of 22:36, 17 December 2018
This page describes a trick that is sometimes helpful in analysis.
Satement
Let and be bounded subsets of the real line. Suppose that for every and we have . Then .
Actually, do and have to be bounded? I think they can even be empty!
Proof
Let and be arbitrary. We have by hypothesis . Since is arbitrary, we have that is an upper bound of the set , so taking the superemum over we have (remember, is the least upper bound, whereas is just another upper bound). Since was arbitrary, we see that is a lower bound of the set . Taking the infimum over , we have , as required.