User:IssaRice/Computability and logic/Gödel's completeness theorem: Difference between revisions

From Machinelearning
(Created page with "I'm confused about the following framing: "The completeness theorem says that, if a bunch of sentences is consistent in the sense of not entailing a contradiction [in a standa...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[../Semantic completeness|semantic completeness]]
I'm confused about the following framing: "The completeness theorem says that, if a bunch of sentences is consistent in the sense of not entailing a contradiction [in a standard system of first-order logic] then it has a model."<ref>https://math.stackexchange.com/a/436257/35525</ref>
I'm confused about the following framing: "The completeness theorem says that, if a bunch of sentences is consistent in the sense of not entailing a contradiction [in a standard system of first-order logic] then it has a model."<ref>https://math.stackexchange.com/a/436257/35525</ref>
==References==
<references/>

Revision as of 05:50, 21 December 2018

semantic completeness

I'm confused about the following framing: "The completeness theorem says that, if a bunch of sentences is consistent in the sense of not entailing a contradiction [in a standard system of first-order logic] then it has a model."[1]

References