User:IssaRice/Computability and logic/Entscheidungsproblem: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Decidability for first-order logic versus decidability for a particular theory== | ==Decidability for first-order logic versus decidability for a particular theory== | ||
The question of decidability (i.e. is this thing decidable or undecidable?) can be asked of both logics/formal systems and of theories. | The question of decidability (i.e. is this thing decidable or undecidable?) can be asked of both logics/formal systems and of theories. This is similar to how both soundness and completeness can be asked of logics and theories (and why we have both the completeness theorem and the incompleteness theorems!). | ||
Even though first-order ''logic'' is undecidable, a particular first-order ''theory'' (i.e. a theory specified in first-order logic via some non-logical axioms) may still be decidable. | Even though first-order ''logic'' is undecidable, a particular first-order ''theory'' (i.e. a theory specified in first-order logic via some non-logical axioms) may still be decidable. |
Revision as of 00:50, 9 February 2019
Entscheidungsproblem, also called Hilbert's decision problem is a problem in mathematical logic.
Equivalent formulations
Some things to note:
- A relation is "decidable" means that there is some algorithm such that if is true, then the algorithm outputs "yes", and if is false, then the algorithm outputs "no".
Label | Syntactic or semantic | Statement | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
In terms of validity | Semantic | Take as input a sentence of first-order logic, and decide whether it is valid (a.k.a. universally valid, true-in-every-interpretation). | |
In terms of provability | Syntactic | Take as input a sentence of first-order logic, and decide whether it is provable (using only logical axioms). | By Godel's completeness theorem, validity and provability are equivalent. |
In terms of satisfiability | Semantic | Take as input a sentence of first-order logic, and decide whether it is satisfiable. | |
In terms of semantic implication | Semantic | Take as input a set of sentences and a sentence (both of first-order logic), and decide whether semantically implies (a.k.a. logically implies) . |
Decidability for first-order logic versus decidability for a particular theory
The question of decidability (i.e. is this thing decidable or undecidable?) can be asked of both logics/formal systems and of theories. This is similar to how both soundness and completeness can be asked of logics and theories (and why we have both the completeness theorem and the incompleteness theorems!).
Even though first-order logic is undecidable, a particular first-order theory (i.e. a theory specified in first-order logic via some non-logical axioms) may still be decidable.