User:IssaRice/Extreme value theorem: Difference between revisions

From Machinelearning
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Working through the proof in Pugh's book by filling in the parts he doesn't talk about.
Working through the proof in Pugh's book by filling in the parts he doesn't talk about.
For <math>x \in [a,b]</math>, define <math>V_x = f([a,x]) = \{f(t) : t \in [a,x]\}</math> to be the image of <math>f</math> up to and including <math>x</math>.


Let <math>M = \sup\{f(x) : x \in [a,b]\}</math> and <math>X = \{x \in [a,b] : \sup V_x < M\}</math>.
Let <math>M = \sup\{f(x) : x \in [a,b]\}</math> and <math>X = \{x \in [a,b] : \sup V_x < M\}</math>.

Revision as of 22:25, 1 June 2019

Working through the proof in Pugh's book by filling in the parts he doesn't talk about.

For x[a,b], define Vx=f([a,x])={f(t):t[a,x]} to be the image of f up to and including x.

Let M=sup{f(x):x[a,b]} and X={x[a,b]:supVx<M}.

Now suppose f(a)<M. Then aX. We already know that X is bounded above, for instance by the number b. We can thus take the least upper bound of X, say c=supX. We already know f(c)M, so if we can just eliminate the possibility that f(c)<M, we will be done.

So suppose f(c)<M. We can choose ϵ>0 with ϵ<Mf(c).[note 1] By continuity at c, there exists a δ>0 such that |tc|<δ implies |f(t)f(c)|<ϵ. This means f(t)<f(c)+ϵ<M. If tcδ/2 then there exists some xX such that t<x. This means supVtsupVx<M so tX. Otherwise if cδ/2tc then |tc|<δ so f(t)<f(c)+ϵ<M. So now what can we say about supVc? We want to say supVc<M. We can do this by showing that there exists a number M<M such that f(t)<M for all t[a,c]. That way, supVcM<M. But M=supVc works.

supVcδ/2<M so let M=(M+supVcδ/2)/2. Then supVcδ/2<M<M and if vVcδ/2 we have vsupVcδ/2<M.

Therefore, c=b, which implies that M=supVb=supVc<M, a contradiction.

Notes

  1. it is important here that ϵ does not equal Mf(c); choosing this ϵ would be too weak and we would not be able to conclude supVc<M, rather only that supVcM.