|
|
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| Now we can choose <math>M' = \max\{\sup V_{c-\delta/2}, f(c) + \epsilon\}</math>. Then whatever <math>t \in [a,c]</math> happens to be, we can say <math>f(t) \leq M'</math>. | | Now we can choose <math>M' = \max\{\sup V_{c-\delta/2}, f(c) + \epsilon\}</math>. Then whatever <math>t \in [a,c]</math> happens to be, we can say <math>f(t) \leq M'</math>. |
|
| |
|
| If <math>c < b</math> then | | If <math>c < b</math> then by continuity we can find points <math>t</math> to the right of <math>c</math> where <math>\sup V_t < M</math>, which contradicts the fact that <math>c</math> is an upper bound of such points. |
|
| |
|
| | | Therefore, <math>c=b</math>, which implies that <math>M = \sup V_b = \sup V_c < M</math>, a contradiction. So the assumption that <math>f(c) < M</math> was false, and we conclude <math>f(c) = M</math>. |
| Therefore, <math>c=b</math>, which implies that . So the assumption that <math>f(c) < M</math> was false, and we conclude <math>f(c) = M</math>. | |
| | |
| If <math>c=b</math> then <math>M = \sup V_b = \sup V_c < M</math>, a contradiction.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Notes== | | ==Notes== |
|
| |
|
| <references group="note" /> | | <references group="note" /> |
Revision as of 23:32, 1 June 2019
Working through the proof in Pugh's book by filling in the parts he doesn't talk about.
For
, define
to be the image of
up to and including
.
Let
and
.
Our goal now is to find some
such that
. If
this is easy.
So now suppose
. Then
. We already know that
is bounded above, for instance by the number
. We can thus take the least upper bound of
, say
. We already know
, so if we can just eliminate the possibility that
, we will be done.
So suppose
. We want to find
such that
for all
. That would mean that
. To do this, we split the interval into two parts. Choose
with
.[note 1] By continuity at
, there exists a
such that
implies
. So now pick a point like
, and split the interval into
and
.
- Since
, there exists
such that
(otherwise
would be a smaller upper bound for
). So
. This means that
for all
.
- But now if
, then
, so
. This means
.
Now we can choose
. Then whatever
happens to be, we can say
.
If
then by continuity we can find points
to the right of
where
, which contradicts the fact that
is an upper bound of such points.
Therefore,
, which implies that
, a contradiction. So the assumption that
was false, and we conclude
.
Notes
- ↑ It is important here that
does not equal
; choosing this
would be too weak and we would not be able to conclude
, rather only that
.