User:IssaRice/AI safety/Asymmetry of risks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"I guess I have a high prior that making something smarter than human is dangerous unless we know exactly what we’re doing including the social/political aspects, and you don’t, so you think the burden of proof is on me?" [https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HekjhtWesBWTQW5eF/agis-as-populations#comment-PEsLPm8HSftYvpgt4] "In general when someone proposes a mechanism by which the world might end, I think the burden of proof is on them. You’re not just claiming “dangerous”, you’re claiming something like “more dangerous than anything else has ever been, ''even'' if it’s intent-aligned”. This is an incredibly bold claim and requires correspondingly thorough support." [https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HekjhtWesBWTQW5eF/agis-as-populations#comment-CdEBDCN3GxuSaLmg3] | "I guess I have a high prior that making something smarter than human is dangerous unless we know exactly what we’re doing including the social/political aspects, and you don’t, so you think the burden of proof is on me?" [https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HekjhtWesBWTQW5eF/agis-as-populations#comment-PEsLPm8HSftYvpgt4] "In general when someone proposes a mechanism by which the world might end, I think the burden of proof is on them. You’re not just claiming “dangerous”, you’re claiming something like “more dangerous than anything else has ever been, ''even'' if it’s intent-aligned”. This is an incredibly bold claim and requires correspondingly thorough support." [https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/HekjhtWesBWTQW5eF/agis-as-populations#comment-CdEBDCN3GxuSaLmg3] | ||
https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/QSBgGv8byWMjmaGE5/preparing-for-the-talk-with-ai-projects#comment-B6KDnC2zYDQRpz2iX | |||
Latest revision as of 03:58, 23 June 2020
"I guess I have a high prior that making something smarter than human is dangerous unless we know exactly what we’re doing including the social/political aspects, and you don’t, so you think the burden of proof is on me?" [1] "In general when someone proposes a mechanism by which the world might end, I think the burden of proof is on them. You’re not just claiming “dangerous”, you’re claiming something like “more dangerous than anything else has ever been, even if it’s intent-aligned”. This is an incredibly bold claim and requires correspondingly thorough support." [2]