User:IssaRice/Schröder–Bernstein theorem: Difference between revisions

From Machinelearning
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* what is the proof that uses axiom of choice, and how does choice simplify the proof?
* what is the proof that uses axiom of choice, and how does choice simplify the proof?
* is the result a fixed point result? (if so how can we phrase it as such?) or is it just that some of the proofs makes use of the fixed point ideas?
* is the result a fixed point result? (if so how can we phrase it as such?) or is it just that some of the proofs makes use of the fixed point ideas?
==Unified notation==
<math>f : A \to B</math>
<math>g : B \to A</math>
<math>C_0 = A \setminus g(B)</math>
<math>C_{n+1} = (g \circ f)(C_n)</math> for all <math>n \geq 0</math>
<math>D_0 = B \setminus f(A)</math>
<math>D_{n+1} = (f \circ g)(D_n)</math> for all <math>n \geq 0</math>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 04:53, 30 August 2020

questions:

  • are the ancestor proof and the iterated partition proof actually different, or do they just look different on the surface? btw this is a very nice writeup of the ancestor proof (much clearer than wikipedia's version); HT Satira. UPDATE: these are actually basically the same proof, just written in different notation.
  • what is the proof that uses axiom of choice, and how does choice simplify the proof?
  • is the result a fixed point result? (if so how can we phrase it as such?) or is it just that some of the proofs makes use of the fixed point ideas?

Unified notation

f:AB

g:BA

C0=Ag(B)

Cn+1=(gf)(Cn) for all n0

D0=Bf(A)

Dn+1=(fg)(Dn) for all n0

References