User:IssaRice/Fundamental theorem of calculus: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There's a typical picture of FTC1 that you see in places like Pugh's analysis book or 3Blue1Brown's video on FTC. This explanation makes sense, but I want point out a few different ways of thinking about the picture. One is, like the 3b1b video says, to look at the incremental area. You get <math>\Delta A(x) \approx f(x)\Delta x</math>. So then you divide by <math>\Delta x</math> and take the limit as <math>\Delta x \to 0</math> and get <math>A'(x) = \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \frac{\Delta A(x)}{\Delta x} = f(x)</math>. | There's a typical picture of FTC1 that you see in places like Pugh's analysis book or 3Blue1Brown's video on FTC. This explanation makes sense, but I want point out a few different ways of thinking about the picture. One is, like the 3b1b video says, to look at the incremental area. You get <math>\Delta A(x) \approx f(x)\Delta x</math>. So then you divide by <math>\Delta x</math> and take the limit as <math>\Delta x \to 0</math> and get <math>A'(x) = \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \frac{\Delta A(x)}{\Delta x} = f(x)</math>. | ||
Another way of looking at this that I saw in one of John Stillwell's books is that <math>\int f(x) \, dx</math> is the sum of infinitely many quantities <math>f(x)\, dx</math>. So the incremental thing you add is <math>f(x)\, dx</math>, i.e. <math>d \int f(x) \, dx = f(x)\, dx</math>. Now if you divide by <math>dx</math> you get <math>{d \int f(x) \, dx}{dx} = f(x)</math>, which again is FTC1. | Another way of looking at this that I saw in one of John Stillwell's books is that <math>\int f(x) \, dx</math> is the sum of infinitely many quantities <math>f(x)\, dx</math>. So the incremental thing you add is <math>f(x)\, dx</math>, i.e. <math>d \int f(x) \, dx = f(x)\, dx</math>. Now if you divide by <math>dx</math> you get <math>\frac{d \int f(x) \, dx}{dx} = f(x)</math>, which again is FTC1. | ||
Now, on to FTC2. | Now, on to FTC2. | ||
Revision as of 01:52, 8 September 2021
There's a typical picture of FTC1 that you see in places like Pugh's analysis book or 3Blue1Brown's video on FTC. This explanation makes sense, but I want point out a few different ways of thinking about the picture. One is, like the 3b1b video says, to look at the incremental area. You get . So then you divide by and take the limit as and get .
Another way of looking at this that I saw in one of John Stillwell's books is that is the sum of infinitely many quantities . So the incremental thing you add is , i.e. . Now if you divide by you get , which again is FTC1.
Now, on to FTC2.