User:IssaRice/Little o notation: Difference between revisions

From Machinelearning
(Created page with " Can we write just <math>f \in o(g)</math> or <math>f = o(g)</math> or <math>f(x) \in o(g(x))</math> or <math>f(x) = o(g(x))</math>? In general we can't because for this not...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Definition==


Definition (little o near a point). Let <math>f : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> and <math>g : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> be two functions, and let <math>a \in \mathbf R</math>. We say that <math>f</math> is little o of <math>g</math> near <math>a</math> iff for every <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists <math>\delta > 0</math> such that <math>|x - a| < \delta</math> implies <math>|f(x)| < \epsilon|g(x)|</math>.


Definition (little o at infinity). Let <math>f : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> and <math>g : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> be two functions. We say that <math>f</math> is little o of <math>g</math> at infinity iff for every <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists <math>M</math> such that for all <math>x</math>, <math>x > M</math> implies <math>|f(x)| < \epsilon|g(x)|</math>.


Can we write just <math>f \in o(g)</math> or <math>f = o(g)</math> or <math>f(x) \in o(g(x))</math> or <math>f(x) = o(g(x))</math>? In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument <math>x</math> is going. In algorithms, we have <math>x \to \infty</math>, but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have <math>x \to 0</math>
Can we write just <math>f \in o(g)</math> or <math>f = o(g)</math> or <math>f(x) \in o(g(x))</math> or <math>f(x) = o(g(x))</math>? In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument <math>x</math> is going. In algorithms, we have <math>x \to \infty</math>, but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have <math>x \to 0</math>

Revision as of 02:29, 27 November 2018

Definition

Definition (little o near a point). Let f:RR and g:RR be two functions, and let aR. We say that f is little o of g near a iff for every ϵ>0 there exists δ>0 such that |xa|<δ implies |f(x)|<ϵ|g(x)|.

Definition (little o at infinity). Let f:RR and g:RR be two functions. We say that f is little o of g at infinity iff for every ϵ>0 there exists M such that for all x, x>M implies |f(x)|<ϵ|g(x)|.

Can we write just fo(g) or f=o(g) or f(x)o(g(x)) or f(x)=o(g(x))? In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument x is going. In algorithms, we have x, but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have x0