User:IssaRice/Little o notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Definition (little o at infinity). Let <math>f : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> and <math>g : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> be two functions. We say that <math>f</math> is little o of <math>g</math> at infinity iff for every <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists <math>M</math> such that for all <math>x</math>, <math>x > M</math> implies <math>|f(x)| < \epsilon|g(x)|</math>. | Definition (little o at infinity). Let <math>f : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> and <math>g : \mathbf R \to \mathbf R</math> be two functions. We say that <math>f</math> is little o of <math>g</math> at infinity iff for every <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists <math>M</math> such that for all <math>x</math>, <math>x > M</math> implies <math>|f(x)| < \epsilon|g(x)|</math>. | ||
Can we write just <math>f \in o(g)</math> or <math>f = o(g)</math> or <math>f(x) \in o(g(x))</math> or <math>f(x) = o(g(x))</math>? In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument <math>x</math> is going. In algorithms, we have <math>x \to \infty</math>, but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have <math>x \to 0</math> | |||
Can we write just <math>f \in o(g)</math> or <math>f = o(g)</math> or <math>f(x) \in o(g(x))</math> or <math>f(x) = o(g(x))</math>? | |||
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="overflow: auto;"> In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument <math>x</math> is going. In algorithms, we have <math>x \to \infty</math>, but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have <math>x \to 0</math>.</div> | |||
Revision as of 02:37, 27 November 2018
Definition
Definition (little o near a point). Let and be two functions, and let . We say that is little o of near iff for every there exists such that implies .
Definition (little o at infinity). Let and be two functions. We say that is little o of at infinity iff for every there exists such that for all , implies .
Can we write just or or or ?
In general we can't because for this notation to make sense, we also need to know where the argument is going. In algorithms, we have , but in analysis (e.g. in some definitions of differentiability) we have .