User:IssaRice/Chain rule proofs: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
(→Proof) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
whenever <math>|x-x_0|\leq \delta</math>. So let <math>\epsilon > 0</math>. | whenever <math>|x-x_0|\leq \delta</math>. So let <math>\epsilon > 0</math>. | ||
Now we do some algebraic manipulation. Write | |||
<math>g( | <math display="block">g(y) = g(y_0) + g'(y_0)(y - y_0) + E_g(y,y_0)</math> | ||
<math>f(x) = f(x_0) + f'(x_0)(x - x_0) + E_f(x,x_0)</math> | where <math>E_g(y,y_0) := g(y) - (g(y_0) + g'(y_0)(y - y_0))</math>. This holds for every <math>y \in Y</math>. Since <math>f(x) \in Y</math> we thus have | ||
<math display="block">g(f(x)) = g(f(x_0)) + g'(f(x_0))(f(x) - f(x_0)) + E_g(f(x),f(x_0))</math> | |||
Similarly write | |||
<math display="block">f(x) = f(x_0) + f'(x_0)(x - x_0) + E_f(x,x_0)</math> | |||
where <math>E_f(x,x_0) := f(x) - (f(x_0) + f'(x_0)(x - x_0))</math>. | |||
so | so | ||
Revision as of 03:41, 28 November 2018
Using Newton's approximation
Main idea
The main idea of using Newton's approximation to prove the chain rule is that since f is differentiable at we have the approximation when is near . Similarly since g is differentiable at we have the approximation when is near . Since f is differentiable at , it is continuous there also, so we know that is near whenever is near . This allows us to substitute into whenever is near . So we get
Thus we get , which is what the chain rule says.
Proof
We want to show is differentiable at with derivative . By Newton's approximation, this is equivalent to showing that for every there exists such that
whenever . So let .
Now we do some algebraic manipulation. Write
where . This holds for every . Since we thus have
Similarly write
where .
so
we can rewrite this as
Thus our goal now is to show
old proof
Since is differentiable at , we know is a real number, and we can write
(there is no magic: the terms just cancel out)
If we define we can write
Newton's approximation says that as long as .
Since is differentiable at , we know that it must be continuous at . This means we can keep as long as we keep .
Since and , this means we can substitute and get
Now we use the differentiability of . We can write
Again, we can define and write this as
Now we can substitute this into the expression for to get
where we have canceled out two terms using .
Thus we have
We can write this as
where . Now the left hand side looks like the expression in Newton's approximation. This means to show is differentiable at , we just need to show that .
The stuff in square brackets is our "error term" for . Now we just need to make sure it is small, even after dividing by .
But f is differentiable at , so by Newton's approximation,
we also have
We can bound this from above using the triangle inequality:
Now we can just choose small enough.