User:IssaRice/Linear algebra/Determinant as signed volume of transformation

From Machinelearning
Revision as of 02:39, 28 December 2019 by IssaRice (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Let <math>f : \mathbf R^n \to \mathbf R^n</math> be some function (not necessarily linear) and let <math>\Omega \subseteq \mathbf R^n</math> be some region in space. we will...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Let f:RnRn be some function (not necessarily linear) and let ΩRn be some region in space. we will assume we can assign some "volume" to Ω, e.g. by cutting it up into little cubes and adding up the volumes of the cubes (the volume of a cube is just the product of its edge lengths).

since f takes this space to itself, the image of Ω under f, denoted f(Ω), is another region in space. let's assume f is nice enough that we can assign a volume to f(Ω). we can now ask, what is the volume of f(Ω)? is it related to the volume of Ω somehow? does the volume change if we translate Ω, stretch it, rotate it, etc.?

References

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX7qBVa9cQU -- this is probably the best explanation of the determinant i have ever seen
  • sergei treil's linear algebra done wrong has a pretty good explanation. in particular, i like how he first defines determinant for a list of vectors.