User:IssaRice/Lebesgue theory

some questions for now:

• why all the asymmetry in the usual definitions? [1]
• why isn't the lebesgue integral defined as the area under the graph? pugh's book does it this way. why is the definition in terms of simple function or the inf thing that axler does in MIRA preferred by textbooks?
• what would a corresponding "riemann measure" look like for subsets of R^n?
• why is caratheodory's criterion for measurability defined the way it is? there was a good blog post i saw once that gave a picture but i don't remember if i was fully convinced.