Difference between revisions of "User:IssaRice/Computability and logic/Diagonalization lemma"

From Machinelearning
Jump to: navigation, search
(Diagonalization lemma)
(Diagonalization lemma)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
Then <math>G</math> is <math>A(\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner))</math>, by substituting <math>x = \ulcorner B\urcorner</math> in the definition of <math>B</math>.
 
Then <math>G</math> is <math>A(\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner))</math>, by substituting <math>x = \ulcorner B\urcorner</math> in the definition of <math>B</math>.
  
We also have <math>\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner) = \ulcorner B(\ulcorner B\urcorner)\urcorner</math> by definition of <math>\mathrm{diag}</math>. By definition of <math>G</math>, this is <math>\ulcorner G\urcorner</math>.
+
We also have <math>\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner) = \ulcorner B(\ulcorner B\urcorner)\urcorner</math> by definition of <math>\mathrm{diag}</math>. By definition of <math>G</math>, this is <math>\ulcorner G\urcorner</math>, so we have <math>\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner) = \ulcorner G\urcorner</math>.
  
Thus, <math>G</math> iff <math>A(\ulcorner G\urcorner)</math>.
+
To complete the proof, apply <math>A</math> to both sides of the final equality to obtain <math>A(\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner))</math> iff <math>A(\ulcorner G\urcorner)</math>; this simplifies to <math>G</math> iff <math>A(\ulcorner G\urcorner)</math>.

Revision as of 03:03, 8 February 2019

The diagonalization lemma, also called the Godel-Carnap fixed point theorem, is a fixed point theorem in logic.

Rogers's fixed point theorem

Let f be a total computable function. Then there exists an index e such that \varphi_e \simeq \varphi_{f(e)}.

(simplified)

Define d(x) = \varphi_x(x) (this is actually slightly wrong, but it brings out the analogy better).

Consider the function f\circ d. This is partial recursive, so f\circ d \simeq \varphi_i for some index i.

Now \varphi_{f(d(i))} \simeq \varphi_{\varphi_i(i)} since f\circ d \simeq \varphi_i. This is equivalent to \varphi_{d(i)} by definition of d. Thus, we may take e = d(i) to complete the proof.

Diagonalization lemma

(semantic version)

Let A be a formula with one free variable. Then there exists a sentence G such that G iff A(\ulcorner G\urcorner).

Define \mathrm{diag}(x) to be \ulcorner C(\ulcorner C\urcorner)\urcorner where x = \ulcorner C\urcorner. In other words, given a number x, the function \mathrm{diag} finds the formula with that Godel number, then diagonalizes it (i.e. substitutes the Godel number of the formula into the formula itself), then returns the Godel number of the resulting sentence.

Let B be A(\mathrm{diag}(x)), and let G be B(\ulcorner B\urcorner).

Then G is A(\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner)), by substituting x = \ulcorner B\urcorner in the definition of B.

We also have \mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner) = \ulcorner B(\ulcorner B\urcorner)\urcorner by definition of \mathrm{diag}. By definition of G, this is \ulcorner G\urcorner, so we have \mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner) = \ulcorner G\urcorner.

To complete the proof, apply A to both sides of the final equality to obtain A(\mathrm{diag}(\ulcorner B\urcorner)) iff A(\ulcorner G\urcorner); this simplifies to G iff A(\ulcorner G\urcorner).