User:IssaRice/Computability and logic/Models symbol

From Machinelearning

The "models" symbol, , is used for several purposes in mathematical logic. Roughly, there are two basic purposes:

  1. When the symbol that comes before "" is a structure/interpretation, then it says something about truth in that structure/interpretation.
  2. When the symbol that comes before "" is a sentence or set of sentences, then it says something about semantic consequence (also called logical consequence, logical implication, semantic implication). In this case, we are talking about all possible structures/interpretations.

In either of the above two purposes, we are talking about the semantics (rather than syntax) of a logical system.

  • If is a structure/interpretation and is a set of sentences, then means ...
  • If is a theory and is a sentence, then means ...
  • If is a theory and is a set of sentences, then means ...
  • If is a set of axioms for a theory , and is a sentence, then means ...
  • If is a set of axioms for a theory , and is a set of sentences, then ...
  • if is a formula (or wff), then ...
  • also the variant without anything in front, e.g.,
Part before "" Part after "" Possible pronunciations Meaning
A structure/interpretation A sentence or formula The structure satisfies the formula .[1]
The formula is true in .[1]
The structure makes true the formula .
A set of sentences or formulas A sentence or formula is a logical consequence of .
logically implies .
is a semantic consequence of .
is true in every model of .
Nothing A sentence or formula is valid.[2]
is a tautology (especially in the case of propositional logic).

Notes

Other tricky things:

  • Some books only use the models symbol for one of the two use cases. E.g. Boolos/Burgess/Jeffrey only uses the symbol for truth in an interpretation. Therefore you might be really confused when you start reading other books and you start seeing stuff like .
  • In the Boolos/Burgess/Jeffrey book, if a set of sentences comes after , then the sentences are taken disjunctively rather than conjunctively. (see p. 168)
  • https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2506938/35525

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Derek Goldrei. Propositional and Predicate Calculus. p. 134.
  2. Boolos; Burgess; Jeffrey. Computability and Logic. p. 168.